Hardening and Protecting Endpoints in OT: A Practical Guide for ICS Environments

43

Operational Technology (OT) networks are no longer isolated. From PLCs and RTUs to engineering workstations and HMIs, endpoints in industrial control system (ICS) environments are now exposed to the same cyber threats as corporate IT — plus a few unique, highly specialized ones.

Yet OT has very different priorities: safety, availability, and deterministic behavior often matter more than raw confidentiality. That means you cannot simply “copy‑paste” IT security tools and policies into the plant and hope they work.

This guide is written for OT engineers, security architects, and plant operators who need a practical, step‑by‑step approach to:

• Implement endpoint security software in OT
• Harden and patch Windows and Unix-style operating systems
• Respect ICS constraints: uptime, vendor certifications, legacy systems, and safety

Why OT Endpoints Are Different From IT

In a corporate office, endpoint security is relatively straightforward: deploy an EDR agent, enforce hardening baselines, patch aggressively, and accept short outages when needed.

In OT and ICS, that approach can break production — literally.

Key differences:

• Safety & availability first
  Interrupting a safety controller or engineering station at the wrong time can trigger downtime, product loss, or physical damage.
• Legacy operating systems
  Windows XP, Windows 7, and old Unix variants remain common in plants. They often cannot run modern tools or receive new patches.
• Vendor constraints
  Many ICS vendors certify their applications only with specific OS versions, patch levels, or antivirus engines. Change outside that scope can void support.
• Deterministic performance needs
  Real-time control loops and SCADA traffic expect predictable behavior. Heavy security scans, frequent updates, or CPU spikes can cause latency or dropped packets.
• Network isolation is no longer reliable
  Remote maintenance, IIoT gateways, and enterprise integration mean that “air‑gapped” ICS is largely a myth.

Because of this, OT endpoint protection must be precision‑engineered, not just copied from IT templates.

---

Core Principles of OT Endpoint Security

Before diving into Windows and Unix specifics, anchor on a few core principles that should guide all OT endpoint decisions.

1. Safety and Availability Above All

Security measures must not jeopardize:

• Human safety
• Environmental protection
• Physical equipment integrity
• Regulatory compliance related to operations

Any endpoint control should be tested and evaluated not only for security impact, but also for effects on:

• Real-time performance
• Application compatibility
• Recovery and failover behavior

2. Defense-in-Depth, Not Single Controls

No single control will save you. Build layers:

• Network segmentation and firewalls
• Endpoint hardening and configuration baselines
• Application allowlisting
• Endpoint security software (AV/EDR/OT EPP)
• User access controls and MFA (where possible)
• Monitoring, logging, and anomaly detection

If one layer fails, others still stand.

3. Least Privilege and Minimal Functionality

Every endpoint should do only what it must:

• Minimal set of services running
• Minimal users and groups
• Minimal installed software
• Minimal privileges for users and applications

This reduces the attack surface and limits blast radius when a compromise does occur.

4. Change Management and Documentation

In OT, uncontrolled changes are often worse than a theoretical vulnerability.

• Every configuration change must be documented, approved, and test‑driven.
• Rollback plans must exist for all critical systems.
• Configuration baselines should be version controlled and repeatable.

5. Assume Compromise is Possible

OT is increasingly targeted by ransomware groups, nation-state actors, and opportunistic malware. Work under the assumption that:

• Some endpoints will be compromised at some point.
• Your job is to make it hard, limit lateral movement, and reduce impact, and detect it early.

---

Understanding the OT Endpoint Landscape

“Endpoints” in OT are more varied than in IT. A smart strategy begins with knowing exactly what you’re protecting.

Typical OT Endpoint Types

1. Engineering Workstations (EWS)
   • Usually Windows-based
   • Used to program PLCs, DCS controllers, safety systems
   • High privileges and often weakly segregated — prime targets
2. Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs)
   • Windows or Linux
   • Visualize and control processes
   • Often touched by operators all day, highly exposed to human error
3. SCADA Servers & Historians
   • Collect and manage plant data
   • Often run on Windows Server or Linux
   • High-value for attackers (pivoting, data exfiltration, manipulation)
4. Domain Controllers & File Servers in OT Zone
   • Critical for authentication and file sharing within OT
   • Compromise can cascade to many other hosts
5. Gateways and Data Diodes (Industrial IoT, OPC, MQTT, etc.)
   • Often Linux-based appliances or Unix-style OS
   • Bridge OT to IT or cloud — key points in your security posture
6. Maintenance Laptops / Portable Engineering Devices
   • Plugged into various segments, often with admin tools and project files
   • Frequently leave site and connect to other networks — high-risk
7. Embedded Devices with OS-like Stacks
   • Some PLCs, RTUs, and smart sensors may run stripped-down Linux
   • Patching and hardening often overlooked

---

Endpoint Security Software in OT: Architecture & Requirements

“Endpoint security software” in an OT environment usually includes some combination of:

• Next-Gen Antivirus (NGAV)
• EDR (Endpoint Detection & Response)
• Application Allowlisting / Control
• Host-based Intrusion Prevention Systems (HIPS)
• OT-specialized Endpoint Protection Platforms (EPP)

What OT-Specific Endpoint Protection Should Provide

When selecting or configuring endpoint security tools for ICS, evaluate them against OT constraints:

1. Low and Predictable Resource Usage
   • CPU, memory, and disk I/O must remain stable
   • Avoid “full disk scans” during production windows
2. Deterministic Scheduling
   • Ability to control when scans or updates occur
   • Option to completely disable or strictly schedule background tasks
3. Offline and Bandwidth-Constrained Operation
   • Endpoints may not have continuous internet or corporate connectivity
   • Must support offline updates (USB, internal repositories)
   • Local caching of signatures and models
4. Strong Application Control / Allowlisting
   • In OT, you usually know exactly which applications should run
   • Locking down to an approved list is powerful and often feasible
5. Vendor Support and Certification
   • Many ICS vendors list compatible AV/EDR products and configurations
   • Always check and align with vendor guidance to avoid breaking support
6. Centralized Management Across Zones
   • Central console for OT endpoints, ideally inside OT DMZ or security zone
   • Role-based access control (RBAC) for OT administrators
   • Compatibility with SIEM or OT security monitoring platforms
7. Granular Policies for Different Asset Classes
   • Engineering workstations vs HMIs vs historians
   • Support distinct profiles for different risk and performance requirements

---

Hardening Windows Endpoints in ICS

Windows is still the dominant OS for ICS consoles, engineering stations, and historian servers. It is also a primary target for attackers.

Below is a practical hardening approach tailored for OT.

1. Start with an OT-Specific Baseline

Avoid using generic corporate Group Policy baselines without review — they often break ICS functionality.

Instead:

• Start from:
  • Microsoft Security Baselines (matching OS version)
  • Any ICS vendor hardening guides (DCS/SCADA vendors often publish them)
• Adapting them for OT:
  • Relax settings that conflict with vendor application requirements
  • Tighten others where there is no operational impact

Maintain separate GPOs for OT and IT domains.

2. Local Account and Authentication Hardening

Goals: Reduce misuse of local admin accounts and credential theft.

Key controls:

• Disable or rename built-in Administrator account, where possible
• Enforce strong password policies:
  • Length ≥14 characters for human accounts
  • Service accounts with randomly generated long passwords, safely stored
• Limit local administrators:
  • Only specific jump hosts or admin groups
  • Remove “Domain Users” from local groups by default
• Use pass-the-hash and credential theft mitigations:
  • Enable Credential Guard where compatible
  • Disable WDigest (no clear-text passwords in memory)
  • Restrict use of tools like PsExec to dedicated admin workstations

In domains:

• Implement tiered administration:
  • Use separate accounts for domain admin tasks vs daily engineering use
  • Never log into HMIs or EWS with domain admin accounts during routine work

3. Service and Feature Minimization

Reduce Windows’ attack surface:

• Remove unneeded roles and features:
  • Unused IIS components
  • Print services if not required
  • Legacy protocols (SMBv1, Telnet, etc.)
• Disable unnecessary services:
  • Remote Registry (unless explicitly needed and secured)
  • Unused remote access tools
  • Consumer features (Xbox services, media sharing, etc.)

Use PowerShell Desired State Configuration (DSC) or GPO to consistently enforce service states across OT hosts.

4. Windows Firewall and Host-Based Filtering

OT endpoints should not trust the internal network by default.

• Turn on Windows Defender Firewall (or equivalent) on all profiles
• Define whitelisted rules by role:
  • HMIs: allow SCADA protocols (e.g., OPC, Modbus/TCP via SCADA server), historian connections, engineering server access
  • EWS: allow controller programming protocols to specific subnets only
  • Historians: allow data collection from field servers and queries from reporting tools
• Avoid broad “Any Any” rules — always specify:
  • Source and destination subnets
  • Ports or application paths
  • Protocols (TCP/UDP)

Test firewall changes in a staging environment or against a mirrored test segment to avoid breaking operations.

5. Application Allowlisting

Application allowlisting (or whitelisting) is one of the most effective controls in OT.

• Tools:
  • Windows AppLocker
  • Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC)
  • Third-party application control solutions

Strategy:

1. Start in audit mode
   • Monitor what binaries and scripts are actually used
   • Build a baseline of legitimate activity
2. Create rules based on:
   • Publisher (signed binaries from trusted vendors)
   • File path (trusted directories only)
   • File hash (for unusual critical tools)
3. Gradually switch critical systems to enforced mode
   • EWS and HMIs are ideal candidates, as their software stack rarely changes
   • Block unknown binaries, including malware and unapproved utilities
4. Maintain a clear change process:
   • How to add new versions of vendor software
   • Emergency procedures for temporary overrides (with logging)

6. Microsoft Defender / Third-Party EDR in OT

On Windows endpoints, you will likely deploy:

• Microsoft Defender for Endpoint or
• A third-party EDR/NGAV product compatible with ICS vendors

Key configuration best practices:

• Set real-time protection to “on” but adjust:
  • Exclude ICS application directories recommended by the vendor (but avoid over-excluding)
  • Avoid scanning temporary PLC upload/download paths during critical sessions
• Disable or strictly schedule:
  • Full disk scans during production hours
  • Scheduled maintenance during shift change or known downtime windows
• Use device control features:
  • Block or limit USB mass storage
  • Allow only signed firmware update images or known maintenance tools

Integrate alerts to an OT SOC or security-monitoring team that understands ICS context, not just IT.

7. Logging and Auditing

Logging is critical for OT forensics and continuous monitoring.

On Windows endpoints:

• Enable Security Event Logging for:
  • Logon/logoff (success & failure)
  • Account changes and privilege escalations
  • Application whitelisting events
  • Process creations (e.g., using Sysmon where allowed)
• Centralize logs:
  • Use Windows Event Forwarding to a collector in OT
  • Forward sanitized or filtered events to IT SIEM via OT DMZ
• Protect logs from tampering:
  • Restrict access to log files
  • Implement write-once or immutable storage for critical audit records

---

Hardening Unix-Style Endpoints (Linux, BSD, etc.) in ICS

Linux and other Unix-like systems are common for:

• IoT gateways and protocol converters
• OPC UA and MQTT brokers
• SCADA servers and historians
• Engineering tools on embedded platforms

While variants differ, core hardening concepts are similar.

1. Start with a Minimal OS Install

The best hardening is to never install what you don’t need.

• Use minimal distributions or minimal install profiles
• Avoid optional GUI environments if not required
• Remove development tools from production hosts:
  • Compilers (gcc)
  • Build tools (make)
  • Debuggers

Keep separate build and runtime environments.

2. User, Group, and Authentication Policies

• Disable or lock the root direct SSH login:
  • Set PermitRootLogin no in sshd_config
  • Use sudo with individual accounts and strong authentication
• Enforce strong passwords or keys:
  • Prefer SSH keys with passphrases for admin accounts
  • Use centralized auth (e.g., LDAP/AD via SSSD) only if properly secured in OT
• Limit who can use sudo:
  • Define explicit sudoers entries for necessary commands
  • Use sudo logging

Example sshd_config hardening snippet:

PermitRootLogin noPasswordAuthentication noChallengeResponseAuthentication noUsePAM yesAllowUsers otadmin otengineerClientAliveInterval 300ClientAliveCountMax 2

Adjust based on environment and vendor guidance.

3. Service and Daemon Hardening

• List listening services regularly:
  • ss -tulnp or netstat -tulnp
• Disable unneeded daemons:
  • systemctl disable --now <service>
  • Focus on legacy or unnecessary network-facing services (e.g., Telnet, FTP)
• Restrict management services:
  • SSH: listen only on management interfaces or internal subnets
  • Use firewall rules (iptables, nftables, firewalld) to limit access

Consider chroot jails or containers for specific services where practical and supported.

4. Filesystem and Permissions

• Mount key filesystems with restrictive options:
  • /tmp with noexec,nosuid,nodev
  • /home with nosuid where possible
• Use principles of least privilege:
  • Run applications under dedicated users instead of root
  • Remove write permissions from application binaries and config files for non-admin users
• Regularly check:
  • suid and sgid binaries
  • World-writable directories

Example /etc/fstab entry for /tmp:

UUID=xxxx-xxxx /tmp ext4 defaults,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 2

Test changes thoroughly before deploying to production.

5. Host-Based Firewall and Access Control

• Use iptables / nftables / ufw / firewalld to:
  • Restrict inbound ports to known sources
  • Allow only necessary OT protocols and management ports
• Consider TCP wrappers where still applicable (hosts.allow, hosts.deny) for older systems.

Default to deny inbound, then open ports explicitly by device role.

6. Mandatory Access Control: SELinux / AppArmor

On compatible systems:

• SELinux (e.g., RHEL, CentOS, Rocky, Alma) or
• AppArmor (e.g., Ubuntu, SUSE)

These add another layer of control over what processes may do, even if compromised.

Practical strategy:

1. Start in permissive/complain mode
2. Observe and tune policies based on ICS application behavior
3. Switch to enforcing when stable

Be very cautious on vendor-supported appliances; always confirm their guidance before changing MAC settings.

7. Linux Endpoint Security Agents / EDR

Many EDR and endpoint security products support Linux; for OT, ensure they:

• Support your specific distribution and kernel version
• Have documented compatibility with ICS vendor apps
• Offer:
  • Process monitoring
  • File integrity monitoring
  • Behavior-based detection

Configure them similarly to Windows:

• Minimize performance impact
• Schedule intensive scans for maintenance windows
• Use strong application control where feasible

8. Logging and Audit on Unix Systems

• Use syslog/rsyslog/journald centrally:
  • Forward logs to an OT log collector
  • Filter and forward critical security events to SIEM
• Enable auditd where appropriate:
  • Monitor key files, binaries, and configuration changes
  • Log sudo usage, authentication failures, privilege escalations

Protect logs from tampering via permission controls and, where practical, off-host storage.

---

Patch Management for OT Endpoints

Patching ICS endpoints is notoriously difficult — but not patching is far worse.

You need a risk-based, OT-aware patching strategy that balances security with uptime.

1. Establish an OT Patch Policy

Define and approve a policy that covers:

• Which assets must be patched, and how often
• How vendor approvals and certifications are handled
• Test and validation requirements before deployment
• Exceptions for truly unpatchable legacy systems
• Compensating controls for delayed or skipped patches

2. Build and Maintain an OT Test Environment

A small but representative test lab is invaluable:

• Virtual or physical clones of:
  • HMIs
  • EWS
  • SCADA servers
  • Key Linux gateways
• Simulated controllers, PLCs, and I/O (or spare hardware)
• Replicated ICS software versions

Before patching production, replay typical workloads in the lab:

• Engineering tasks: uploads/downloads, online edits
• HMI usage: graphics, trends, alarms
• Historian queries and reports

Log any instability or performance regressions before approving.

3. Vendor Coordination and Patch Matrices

For each ICS vendor:

• Track:
  • Supported OS versions
  • Allowed patch levels or specific “golden image” states
  • Recommended antivirus/EDR versions
• Many vendors issue:
  • Patch compatibility matrices
  • Security advisories with tested Windows and Linux updates

Align your patching to vendor-supported combinations as much as possible.

4. Patching Windows Endpoints in OT

Use tools like:

• WSUS or internal update servers scoped to OT
• SCCM/ConfigMgr or equivalent, configured with OT-specific collections
• For isolated subnets, offline patching via:
  • Approved USB media with chain-of-custody
  • Staging servers in OT DMZ that replicate from IT

Practical schedule:

• Monthly cycles for less critical OT systems (e.g., OT DMZ servers)
• Quarterly or semi-annual for high-availability ICS nodes, aligned with planned outages
• Emergency patching pipeline for critical vulnerabilities (e.g., exploited in the wild), with:
  • Accelerated testing
  • Out-of-band maintenance windows

5. Patching Unix-Style Endpoints in OT

For Linux/BSD:

• Use local repositories or mirrors:
  • yum/dnf repo mirrors for RHEL-based systems
  • apt repo mirrors for Debian/Ubuntu
• Control versions:
  • Lock critical packages to specific versions when required by vendors
  • Use snapshot repositories for more deterministic patch sets

Avoid running “full system upgrades” (dist-upgrade) on ICS hosts unless a major version upgrade has been fully validated.

6. Handling Legacy and Unpatchable Systems

Some endpoints cannot be upgraded or patched due to:

• Vendor end-of-support
• Application incompatibility
• Hardware limitations

For these:

• Segment aggressively:
  • Place them in a highly restricted VLAN
  • Limit communication to a small set of known peers via firewalls
• Harden as much as possible:
  • Disable unnecessary services
  • Lock down user accounts
  • Enforce host firewalls
• Add layers of protection:
  • Network-based IPS in front of them
  • Application-level proxies or data diodes
• Plan long-term:
  • Migration or replacement projects
  • Virtualization with compensating controls, where feasible and supported

---

Implementing an OT Endpoint Protection Program Step-by-Step

Bringing everything together, here’s a structured roadmap to harden and protect OT endpoints.

Step 1: Asset Inventory and Classification

You cannot protect what you don’t know you have.

• Build a detailed asset inventory:
  • Hostname, IP, OS version
  • Role (HMI, EWS, historian, gateway, etc.)
  • Vendor and application stack
  • Criticality (safety-related, production-critical, supporting)
• Classify endpoints into groups for policy purposes:
  • Safety-critical vs non-safety
  • Vendor-managed vs locally managed
  • Patchable vs legacy

Step 2: Define Security Policies for Each Asset Class

For example:

• EWS / Engineering Stations
  • Strong local and domain auth controls
  • Application whitelisting mandatory
  • EDR/NGAV with low-impact configuration
  • Patching at least quarterly
• HMIs
  • Locked-down user accounts and kiosk-style use
  • Limited network access; no browsing
  • Scheduled patching aligned with plant shutdowns
• Gateways / IIoT Devices
  • Minimal services, hardened SSH, strong keys
  • File integrity monitoring
  • Frequent patches (often easier than vendor HMIs)

Document these policies easily and clearly for both OT and IT teams.

Step 3: Deploy or Reconfigure Endpoint Security Software

• Choose products that:
  • Are tested with your ICS vendors
  • Offer centralized, OT-aware management
  • Support both Windows and Unix-like systems where possible
• Roll out in phases:
  1. Noncritical OT servers
  2. HMIs and EWS in a limited pilot cell
  3. Wider OT zones after successful pilot
• Configure:
  • Real-time protection with tuned exclusions
  • Minimal background tasks during runtime
  • Strict USB/device control where allowed

Step 4: Implement Hardening Baselines

• For Windows:
  • Apply GPO-based baselines for each role
  • Enable host firewalls and logging
  • Configure AppLocker/WDAC in audit then enforcement mode
• For Unix:
  • Harden SSH and system services
  • Implement host firewalls and restrictive filesystem options
  • Configure sudo and tighten user permissions

Maintain version-controlled baselines and apply them consistently.

Step 5: Establish Patch Management and Maintenance Windows

• Define maintenance windows with operations teams
• Create a recurring patch calendar:
  • Test in lab → pilot cell → production rollout
• Track:
  • What was patched, when, and on which systems
  • Known issues and mitigations

Use patching as a routine, predictable activity — not an ad-hoc scramble.

Step 6: Integrate Monitoring and Response

• Forward endpoint security alerts and logs to:
  • OT security monitoring team or SOC
  • Central SIEM with OT-specific detection rules
• Define:
  • Escalation paths for suspicious activity
  • Response runbooks tailored to OT (focus on safe containment)

Step 7: Train and Align People

Tools and configs fail if people don’t understand them.

• Train:
  • OT engineers and operators on secure use of HMIs/EWS
  • Maintenance staff on safe USB/media procedures
  • IT security staff on OT constraints and priorities
• Run joint tabletop exercises:
  • Simulate malware on an HMI
  • Practice coordinated OT/IT response

---

Monitoring, Incident Response, and Continuous Improvement

Endpoint security is not a “set and forget” task, especially in OT.

Continuous Monitoring

Monitor for:

• Unusual processes or binaries on HMIs/EWS
• Unauthorized USB device usage
• Unexpected inbound connections to OT endpoints
• Changes to critical configuration files on Linux/Unix

Leverage:

• EDR alerts
• Syslog/Windows Event logs
• ICS-aware intrusion detection systems (IDS) on the network side

OT-Focused Incident Response

Incident response in ICS must be risk-aware:

• Coordinate closely with operations and safety teams
• Prioritize stabilizing the process, then digital containment
• Avoid heavy-handed actions (e.g., immediate shutdown of all OT hosts) unless absolutely necessary for safety

Prepare playbooks for scenarios like:

• Malware infection on an engineering workstation
• Ransomware on an HMI server
• Suspicious remote access attempt from IT to OT

Metrics and Continuous Improvement

Track metrics such as:

• Percentage of OT endpoints with current patches (per policy)
• Coverage of endpoint security software by asset class
• Number and severity of endpoint-related security incidents
• Mean time to detect (MTTD) and mean time to respond (MTTR) for OT endpoints

Use these to refine:

• Hardening baselines
• Patch processes
• Training and awareness programs

---

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Below are recurring mistakes seen in OT endpoint protection projects — and how to sidestep them.

Pitfall 1: Copying IT Policies Directly into OT

Risk: Break ICS applications, cause downtime, or conflict with vendor support.

Avoid by:

• Building OT-specific baselines
• Testing in a lab first
• Involving OT engineers in policy design

Pitfall 2: Over-Excluding Endpoint Security Scanning

To “avoid issues,” some teams exclude entire drives or processes from AV/EDR scanning.

Risk: Malware can hide and operate without detection.

Avoid by:

• Applying minimal, vendor-approved exclusions only
• Testing performance impact of scanning with realistic workloads
• Considering application allowlisting in parallel

Pitfall 3: Ignoring Legacy Systems

Old Windows or Unix systems are often left unprotected because “they’re fragile.”

Risk: They become the easiest initial foothold and pivot point.

Avoid by:

• Segmentation and strict access control
• Compensating controls: network IPS, application firewalls, data diodes
• Long-term lifecycle planning for upgrades or isolation

Pitfall 4: Uncontrolled Use of Portable Media

USB sticks and maintenance laptops remain common infection vectors.

Avoid by:

• Strong device control policies on endpoints
• Dedicated, scanned, and controlled “clean media” for patching and updates
• Training vendors and local technicians on media hygiene

Pitfall 5: Lack of Coordination Between IT and OT

Disjointed efforts lead to gaps and conflicts.

Avoid by:

• Creating a joint IT–OT security group
• Sharing architecture diagrams, inventories, and baselines
• Defining clear ownership for each control (e.g., GPOs, EDR, patching)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Should every OT endpoint run EDR/NGAV software?

Not necessarily every endpoint, but all general-purpose OS endpoints (Windows and Unix-like) should run some form of endpoint protection, unless:

• Vendor explicitly forbids it, and
• Strong compensating controls are in place (e.g., strict segmentation, network IPS, application whitelisting at another layer).

For embedded devices and fragile legacy systems, focus on:

• Network isolation
• Minimizing exposed services
• External monitoring (network IDS/IPS, firewall logs)

How often should we patch OT endpoints?

There is no universal schedule, but a practical starting point:

• Monthly for OT DMZ servers and less critical systems
• Quarterly or during planned maintenance windows for mission-critical ICS servers and HMIs
• Emergency patches as needed for actively exploited vulnerabilities, with accelerated but still controlled testing

The key is consistency and documented risk-based exceptions, not perfect real-time patching.

Can we safely enable Windows Defender Firewall on all OT hosts?

Yes, but it must be:

• Planned and tested in a lab and pilot cell
• Based on well-defined rules per role (HMI, EWS, historian, etc.)
• Deployed in stages (audit/logging mode first, then enforcement)

Do not enable a strict firewall baseline globally in one step without validation — that is a recipe for outages.

Is application allowlist realistic in ICS?

Yes — in many cases, it is easier in OT than in IT because:

• The application set is small and relatively static
• Changes are infrequent and controlled via change management

Start in audit mode, tune, then enforce. It is especially powerful on:

• HMIs
• EWS
• Dedicated SCADA servers
• Gateways with fixed software stacks

How do we handle vendor systems that are “certified only for Windows XP”?

For truly legacy systems:

• Place them on isolated network segments
• Strictly control who can access them and from where
• Use jump hosts with modern controls (MFA, EDR) to reach them
• Consider virtualization and virtual network microsegmentation, if consistent with vendor support
• Plan long-term migration or replacement

Treat them as high-risk, high-value assets, not “too old to bother with.”

Final Thoughts

Hardening and protecting OT endpoints is not about blindly installing security tools or pushing IT templates into the plant. It is about engineering security into the ICS environment with respect for:

• Safety and availability
• Vendor constraints and legacy realities
• Human workflows of operators, engineers, and maintenance teams

By combining endpoint security software, OS hardening, and disciplined patch management for both Windows and Unix-style systems, you can:

• Shrink the attack surface
• Contain and detect intrusions earlier
• Maintain safe and reliable production even under cyber pressure

For organizations moving deeper into Industrial IoT and connected OT, this is no longer optional — it is foundational to operational resilience.